The Local Government Association of Queensland (LGAQ) says communities are being held to ransom by irresponsible dog owners – with councils caught up in the costly process.
LGAQ Chief Executive Officer, Alison Smith says ratepayers were footing the bill while pet owners dragged councils through the courts.
In one recent case, a Queensland council had to foot a $1million-plus bill to keep a dog in the pound and pay for court and legal costs, said Ms Smith.
“Councils don’t have the option to simply release these animals – they are dangerous and can’t be put back out on the streets to attack again, and potentially kill,” she said.
“The current system allows irresponsible owners to drag out the court process and rack up hundreds of thousands of dollars that their neighbours ultimately have to pay for through their council rates. It’s not fair, when most dog owners do the right thing.
“Councils don’t take seizing animals lightly. They seize them after a dangerous attack, to keep the community safe. The current system allows owners to launch endless appeals, in which no one wins.”
Ms Smith said councils across the state have welcomed desperately-needed State Government proposals to reform and streamline the treatment of seized dangerous dogs.
“Councils have welcomed the moves by the State Government to get tough on irresponsible owners,” Ms Smith said.
“We need a swift, streamlined and humane process that properly protects the community without the future of these animals being tied up in lawfare in the courts.
“Councils have no option but to see these cases through. We’ve seen too many children, adults and pets bitten, mauled and even killed to let these dogs back into the community.”
Moreton Bay Mayor, Peter Flannery said Moreton Bay Council has been calling for action since 2019, after passing a resolution at the Local Government Association of Queensland’s annual conference for a review of the Animal Management Act and also Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT) processes.
“Our position for the past four years has been clear, Councils need strengthened powers to investigate and manage serious dog attacks, as well as review the QCAT appeals process,” Mayor Flannery said.
“I’m a dog owner and a dog lover, but when a dog is involved in a vicious, unprovoked attack and there is clear evidence of the incident the dog should be seized or surrendered immediately to protect the community.
“We need to be black and white about this, we’ve been warning the Government about this issue for years and every time a kid is mauled or another dog attacked it’s just horrific.
“Our system needs to put victims and their families first, because they live the rest of their lives with the emotional and physical scars of dog attacks.
“It’s not right and it’s not fair, which is why our legislation and QCAT need improving.”
The Mayor said Moreton Bay had learned this lesson the hard way in 2016, when it lost a QCAT case after multiple appeals.
“In that particular case the appeals process dragged on so long that the dog in question was impounded for more than a year, costing ratepayers thousands of dollars to keep the dangerous dog impounded which likely cause the animal itself some distress,” he said.
“So the system currently really isn’t working for anyone. The fact is that in really bad cases dangerous dogs are like a ticking time bomb, they definitely don’t belong in suburban environments. So I hope that the State Government will take swift and decisive action against dangerous dogs in the interests of public safety.”
RSPCA GM Inspectorate and Rescue, Rachel Woodrow said RSPCA Queensland agreed that no dog should have to languish in pounds awaiting a protracted legal process.
“When a dog is removed from its owner and its daily routine and then placed into a pound environment, it creates significant stress on the dog,” she said.
“This of course is exacerbated over time, compromising the welfare of the dog and the safety and mental health of pound staff required to care for those dogs.
“We strongly support a streamlined legal review process that increases the responsibility on all those involved, particularly when dogs are being held in care awaiting the outcome,” said Ms Woodrow.
LGAQ cited several recent costly cases including:
- A dog escaped its yard to launch a series of attacks, including injuring a jogger in the street.
According to court decision, the dog failed every behaviour test and his “predatory aggression” was “profound”.
Dog spent more than three years in detention.
Cost to ratepayers: More than $1 million including legal and other costs of the case.
- Two dogs seized after savagely attacking and killing neighbouring dog.
The dogs spent more than three-and-a-half years in the pound after owner launched appeal.
Cost to ratepayers: $50,000 in legal costs and $32,000 in detention costs.
- Dog with a previous violent history broke from a parked car to savage a small dog being walked on a lead, with the incident caught on CCTV.
Elderly man injured trying to separate the dogs. The smaller dog needed vet care for injuries.
Cost to ratepayers: $7,580 after 15-month legal battle, pound and vet costs.
- Pair of dogs mauled another, causing grievous bodily harm.
Dogs spent 106 days in care before QCAT ordered them put down.
Cost to ratepayers: $3,370.