Thursday, May 30, 2024

Mallacoota airport changes won’t fly with locals

East Gippsland Council has moved to reassure Mallacoota residents that their airport will continue to serve as a hub for Angel Flight, police, fire emergency support and ambulance services, following Council’s decision to opt out of Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) certification.

Changes to CASA regulations mean that the Mallacoota Airport is no longer able to meet the requirements of certification. While this does not affect the way that Council will manage and maintain the airport, it does mean that its ability to issue Notices to Airmen (NOTAMs) about airport conditions have been removed, and the use of instrument procedures for fixed-wing aircraft are not available.

“Council considers that CASA failed to think through some of the unintended consequences of the changes to airport registrations, especially to small remote airports such as Mallacoota, which relies on emergency service support,” it said in a statement.

Council says it is now working with the Australian Airports Association, local members of parliament, responsible government ministers and CASA to draw the consequence to its attention and attempt to have the ruling of instrument flight procedures reinstated for non-certified aerodromes.

Council has also sought reassurances that specialised helicopter operations such as the Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) remain able to use instrument procedures. Helicopter operators are responsible to prepare and have CASA approve instrument procedures for use at Mallacoota Airport.

Mayor, Mark Reeves, said Mallacoota Airport remains safe, functional and accessible.

“Council is aware that the registration issue has been presented to the local community as Council’s fault and that this has caused local concern and anxiety,” said Mayor Reeves.

“The reality is that while services such as Air Ambulance and Angel Flights might be affected if there are adverse weather conditions in which it’s not safe to land, that might be the case at some certified airports, too.

“The simple fact is bad weather remains bad weather, whether you have an instrument approach offered or not. The type of instrument approach our airports offer does not guarantee you can land – at any of our airports pilots still need to use visual skills to land.

“If we had not chosen to voluntarily deregister Mallacoota Airport, we are quite certain that CASA would have closed the airport and forced deregistration,” the Mayor said.

Council said it has noted local and Angel Flight’s calls to reinstate the airport’s registration but stated that this was not a simple process.

“The certification requirements have changed and would require, among other things, significant infrastructure and earthworks of the secondary unsealed runway; the reconstruction of the taxiway area and apron used by Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) as a fire base; and vegetation management of trees around the airport outside of the vegetation management permit,” Council said in a statement.

“Council is, therefore, encouraging the local community and airport users to join it in taking the consequences of the CASA-introduced changes back to CASA for reconsideration.”

Council says it has also begun advocating for Federal and State government funds to allow the work to be carried out.

“But there’s no a quick fix available to us,” said Mayor Reeves.

“This is really a case of CASA having to fully consider the implications of changes to registrations to small and remote airports across Australia and changing its guidelines to continue to allow both NOTAM and instrument flight procedures for fixed-wing aircraft at these important airports.

“In the meantime, we remain committed to continuing to provide a functional airport for users. Since the deregistration of Mallacoota Airport, we have continued to have a range of aircraft use the airport, including Air Ambulance Victoria,” he said.

Latest Articles